Is Alembic gonna reissue the modified... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Alembic Club » Alembic Basses & Guitars » Archive through July 16, 2005 » Is Alembic gonna reissue the modified Guild basses? « Previous Next »

Author Message
blazer
Member
Username: blazer

Post Number: 55
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - 4:05 pm:   Edit Post

Okay there's word going round on several Bass player forums that Alembic will be bringing out a reissue of the modified Guild Starfire basses as used by Jack Cassidy (Jefferson airplane, Hot tuna) and Phil Lesh (The greatful dead)

I wanted to be sure if the rumors were either false or true so I'm posting the question on the one forum where it can be told truthfully.

AlembicGuild

If it's really so I would applaud it, they would be awesome.
pace
Intermediate Member
Username: pace

Post Number: 153
Registered: 4-2004
Posted on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - 4:16 pm:   Edit Post

I was told that there was the possibility of a limited edition based on sn#1 as well as Phil's Osage Orange.... nothing about the Starfire, though. Susan knows a few of us would love to have our own Godfather....
jetbass79
Junior
Username: jetbass79

Post Number: 35
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 12:03 am:   Edit Post

My guess would be that Fender Musical Instruments, who owns Guild, would not be happy about this particular endeavor. Since they've graduated from the CBS school of trademark and patent protection they would be unhappy...
glocke
Junior
Username: glocke

Post Number: 44
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 1:43 am:   Edit Post

this would be bad...I would want one really, really bad (esp. the osage orange), but probably couldn't afford it....
jseitang
Member
Username: jseitang

Post Number: 56
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 8:32 am:   Edit Post

i've always entertained with the idea that when i get more $$$, i would have 2 basses made for me: 1 osage bass and one godfather....
811952
Senior Member
Username: 811952

Post Number: 403
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 9:00 am:   Edit Post

I really don't need to hear this kind of stuff. I've got 2 kids to put through college in a few years and a house to pay off...
John
jseitang
Member
Username: jseitang

Post Number: 58
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 9:24 am:   Edit Post

hey you got priorities... like it or not, its what i want.2 more basses!..kids got to go to college, and house needs to get paid off. do what you need to do.
exploiterplayer
Member
Username: exploiterplayer

Post Number: 68
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 10:51 am:   Edit Post

I like the Idea of a limited edition reissue based on serial #1.

Hypothetically, I dont see how Fender could get offended or even begin take legal action against Alembic for buying a huge number of Guild Starfires regardless of the motive to modify and resell them. If anything....Fender should encourage this and give Alembic a special deal on a bulk purchase. This kind of deal would surely seem to benefit both companies and make a lot of bass players happy.
pace
Intermediate Member
Username: pace

Post Number: 155
Registered: 4-2004
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 12:13 pm:   Edit Post

Hypothetically, I dont see Alembic buying any product from Fender/Guild to modify, unless the customer is content with a very limited warranty..... Having a Godfather built from scratch in Santa Rosa would be ideal.
811952
Senior Member
Username: 811952

Post Number: 405
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 12:26 pm:   Edit Post

Jimmy,
I'm just not sure how to go about selling the kids and the house without the wife getting upset, that's all. It's an interesting idea. Fender sells plenty of Gibson and other stuff through Guitar Center. I think the bigger issue would be Alembic doing a big bucks extensive upgrade and accepting the liability for an instrument they didn't build. Otherwise, I think it's an awesome idea. Perhaps the route to pursue would be having Alembic modify an existing instrument you already own, rather than partnering with another manufacturer. Any agreements/liabilities would be kept between the customer and Alembic.
John
bassdr
Junior
Username: bassdr

Post Number: 20
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 12:33 pm:   Edit Post

Sounds like "smoke on the water" to me. I'm sure Mica or Valentino will respond to this thread. Besides, don't we already have exceptional basses already? Anything more would be like extra icing on the cake :-) Michael
jseitang
Member
Username: jseitang

Post Number: 59
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 1:29 pm:   Edit Post

no i think in order to do it right, alembic would have to build everythung from strach. that would be the way i would want it to happen. alembic would have full control of the construction.
sfnic
Junior
Username: sfnic

Post Number: 34
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 1:41 pm:   Edit Post

What Jimmy Said.

I'm sure Susan would rather build them from scratch than have to put the Alembic name on a body manufactured by somebody else. And, alas, they're not tooled up to do semi-hollow-body instruments in that format.

That said, I'm sure they'd be delighted to drop Series electronics (or damned near anything else you can imagine) into a Guild bass _you_ happened to own. Just be prepared to wait well over a year for the mod, and to pay substantially more than a full-bells-and-whistles custom Series bass would cost.

But I don't see it as ever being a "catalog" instrument, even on a very limited run.

Now, replicating #1 would be a bit easier. It's possible they still have the templates, but even if they didn't the crew is brilliant enough to cut new ones, even if they only have photos to work from. Matching the carving will be interesting...

Maybe if we start now, we can convince them to do it as a 40th Anniversary project for 2012. I doubt their current production load would let them cover the necessary R&D and pre-production tooling before then.
byoung
Member
Username: byoung

Post Number: 65
Registered: 12-2004
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 5:32 pm:   Edit Post

I'm quite certain that if someone ordered a duplicate of #1, Alembic would make it.

You just have to have the funds. The kind that come in aluminum (aluminium) briefcases, and have pretty little bands around the bills.

Brad
jetbass79
Junior
Username: jetbass79

Post Number: 36
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 6:43 pm:   Edit Post

Guild no longer produces the Starfire II Basses so they would all have to be made from scratch, most likely with Fender's blessing since the Starfire shape and peghead are registered trademarks of FMIC. And like I stated before, Fender Musical Instruments CORPORATION has graduated from the CBS school of trademark and patent protection so a license would have to be granted from FMIC at some kind of cost that may make the project impractical. Though it would totally be a cool idea...
811952
Senior Member
Username: 811952

Post Number: 406
Registered: 10-2003
Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 6:36 am:   Edit Post

Nic,
""Catalog" instrument" struck me as incredibly funny, for all the obvious reasons. Good stuff...
John
sfnic
Junior
Username: sfnic

Post Number: 38
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Friday, May 20, 2005 - 1:53 pm:   Edit Post

I did have my tongue buried in my cheek when I typed that... :-)
yggdrasil
Junior
Username: yggdrasil

Post Number: 44
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 - 4:18 pm:   Edit Post

A couple of years ago, about the time this board was established (and soon replaced the old yahoo(IIRC) board), Susan and Mica posted that they had plans to make a reissue of Alembic #1 (the Casady bass). AFAIK , this was never pursued. The reissue would not have been as complex as the original in either carving or electronics.

here's a link to my modded Starfire:

http://www3.sympatico.ca/videoimage/Starfire.htm


blazer
Member
Username: blazer

Post Number: 56
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 - 5:28 pm:   Edit Post

That's amazing looking bass, how does it play/Sound?

And while looking at it I can't help but to wonder couldn't they at least put on a more substantial bridge while they were at it?
hydrargyrum
Intermediate Member
Username: hydrargyrum

Post Number: 118
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 11:17 am:   Edit Post

or maybe a few more knobs . . .
sfnic
Junior
Username: sfnic

Post Number: 49
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 1:25 pm:   Edit Post

Oddly enough, that Guild bridge setup, when augmented with brass saddles as shown, works exceptionally well with the Guild body. The coupling to the body's center block is substantial, and the neck joint on the beast is solid. So there's plenty of energy transfer from the bridge back into the neck, which accounts for much of the Starfire's basic woody, somewhat upright-sounding tone. And there's no lack of sustain. Putting a block in wouldn't gain anything in that department, and the Guild bridge actually has more adujstment range than the basic Alembic tune-o-matic.

The brass saddles improve definition and sustain (over the rosewood originals). Also the way the bridge contacts the front plate of the instrument gives good energy transfer to the top as well, which really lets the body chamber pump. Even with the lower f-hole obstructed by the shielding plate, and that side of the bout weighted down by the electronics, the body is very active in the tonal shaping.

Overall, it's quite a remarkable instrument, even before the Alembic mods. I certainly love mine, even without the Alembic pickups and full-bore electronics setup. (I did do a master volume and stereo output setup, and converted all the controls to Clarostats.)

nic
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 1813
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 1:32 pm:   Edit Post

Nic; thanks for the comments on the modified Guild bridge. I figured there was probably a good explanation for why it was there!

Kevin; they probably ran out of knobs <g>.
yggdrasil
Junior
Username: yggdrasil

Post Number: 45
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 1:52 pm:   Edit Post

Well ,I guess I'd better go get some more brass saddles! (only got one...:-)I still haven't got the knobs figured out. I think I'm playing with no filters (what the previous owner calls "passive" - but can't be really passive -i.e. no power), but I'm not sure!

I'm glad there ain't no mo knobs...

It has a full rich sound - maybe electronics, maybe the age, maybe the semi-hollowbody construction, maybe all 3.

The neck is very easy to play.

Frank
sfnic
Member
Username: sfnic

Post Number: 55
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Thursday, May 26, 2005 - 2:46 pm:   Edit Post

Dave - My pleasure. I _love_ my Guild.

(And thanks for cloning those other posts over to the FAQ section. I'm totally flattered!)
elwoodblue
Junior
Username: elwoodblue

Post Number: 39
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Saturday, June 11, 2005 - 1:37 am:   Edit Post

I remember reading about the oils in the osage orange wood being an issue in the original...
Is there schematics somewhere of Phil's bass,the shot of the guts with the backplate off is jaw-dropping.
smiles,
kris
godoze
Member
Username: godoze

Post Number: 92
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, July 05, 2005 - 7:57 am:   Edit Post

too many knobs ! Good god!

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration