| Author | Message | ||
| lidon2001
Senior Member Username: lidon2001 Post Number: 538 Registered: 4-2005 |
I just noticed in the build section a Series circuit using small pots. What compromises are made when using the small pots vs. the larger pots that require the deeper body? Thanks, Tom (Message edited by lidon2001 on December 13, 2014) | ||
| mica
Moderator Username: mica Post Number: 8346 Registered: 6-2000 |
Actually, I think you might have seen the Anniversary electronics with an added 5-pin. BUT you can use the smaller pots with the Series electronics if space requirements dictate. | ||
| lidon2001
Senior Member Username: lidon2001 Post Number: 539 Registered: 4-2005 |
Thanks Mica. With my dummy hum cancellor, I still get silly ideas in the middle of the night. Shirt order just placed. Thanks again. Tom | ||
| edwin
Senior Member Username: edwin Post Number: 1878 Registered: 5-2002 |
I don't know if it's the volume pots that you are talking about, but I just replaced the ancient early 70s volume pots in my Series II equipped Starfire with small volume pots. Apparently they aren't rated for quite as many turns as the larger ones, but they do sound and feel wonderful. So nice to have the scratchiness gone. | ||
| mica
Moderator Username: mica Post Number: 8348 Registered: 6-2000 |
Yup - Edwin is correct about the rotation ratings. | ||
| xlrogue6
Advanced Member Username: xlrogue6 Post Number: 308 Registered: 8-2002 |
"Large pots are better than small ones" is a common Internet myth. Pot quality does not correspond to physical size. | ||
| edwin
Senior Member Username: edwin Post Number: 1881 Registered: 5-2002 |
Not categorically, but in this case with these specific pots, there is a difference. But my guess is at the age of 53, 50,000 rotations will be sufficient and that I don't need to be concerned about having pots that will cover me for 200,000 rotations. |
