Series II Jazz Bass Tone Settings Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Alembic Club » Alembic Basses & Guitars » Archive 2006 » Archive through August 29, 2006 » Series II Jazz Bass Tone Settings « Previous Next »

Author Message
bkbass
Member
Username: bkbass

Post Number: 99
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Friday, August 18, 2006 - 1:19 pm:   Edit Post

Ok guys(and girls) Baring long diatribes of wood species,strings,amp settings and speakers etc.I know these will all affect tone.So for sake of good order (and brevity)how do you series 2 owners set your controls to dial in a standard jazz bass tone? Pretend your plugging directly into a recording board with all settings flat.Only your series controls to work with no cheating.
alembic76407
Senior Member
Username: alembic76407

Post Number: 468
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Friday, August 18, 2006 - 1:45 pm:   Edit Post

Why would you want a Jazz bass sound out of an Alembic?
I sold my Jazz Bass because it would not get an Alembic sound !!!!
olieoliver
Senior Member
Username: olieoliver

Post Number: 624
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Friday, August 18, 2006 - 1:59 pm:   Edit Post

Boost the lows on your bridge PU and the highs on your neck PU and you should get pretty close to a Jazz
(after rereading the original post I removed "and cut the mids on your EQ on your amp ".)

I kind of like the old Jazz sound. I also like my Alembic sound, my Warwick sound, my Music Man Sound.......
I love Pizza but every night would get old.

Lack of variety is only good when it comes to spouses!:-)

(Message edited by olieoliver on August 18, 2006)
palembic
Senior Member
Username: palembic

Post Number: 2451
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 19, 2006 - 2:03 am:   Edit Post

Keep in mind that Alembics in general and especially Series (I and II) have very pronounced and particular highs!
Fidling with open filters and adjusting CVQ's are the way to go I think. The CVQ's basically influence your finger (or pick) attack tone. You have two volumes so that would be the same, I intend to work in live situations with a slightly preference for the Brigde Pickup. The rest is a filter"problem". THere are one for each and the technique of tone shaping is completely different.
I know ONE thing for sure: it IS in there ...somewhere ...hidden ...there ....in that wide vault of low frequencies available under that nice wooden top of that lovely bass.
Tweaking time I guess!

Paul TBO

PS: something I forgot: the POSITION of the PU's given the fact that both guitars have a 34" scale is different too! I dunno about the neck PU but it surely is for the bridge PU! The JB bridge PU is more away from the bridge than in the Alembic Series case. It ads to the clarity of that Alembic sound. So as you already said: it's in pure physics too!

(Message edited by palembic on August 19, 2006)
keavin
Senior Member
Username: keavin

Post Number: 897
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 19, 2006 - 8:29 am:   Edit Post

I tweek my neck filter 1/4 to 1/3 backwards & the CVQ @ 90. w/the bridge filter wide open w/the CVQ @ full,,,,to get somewhat of a fenderish tone w/no plucking......but to be honest it's not going to Sound much like a fender cause alembic series basses have a very strong personality all their own.
bkbass
Intermediate Member
Username: bkbass

Post Number: 101
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, August 21, 2006 - 8:04 am:   Edit Post

Dear 76407, The reason I want a JB sound out of an Alembic is because I can get it out of an Alembic! I view the Series as a Swiss army knife of tone.(I know superfilter as well) All to often when showing up at a studio either the engineer or the producer or both freak out when they don't see the all ubiquious Fender logo. I have been able to get near dead on P and J Bass tones out of my signature electronics and since everything rolls down hill from the series 2 electronics it only goes to follow that theres gold in them thar hills. How many Geddy Lee fans are awe struck over Ric sounds coming out of his JB? One of the many reasons I upgraded to the series electronics was to have the ability to carry less basses around. Olie,palembic and keavin you guys are absolutely correct in the use of both filters being used as with the Q's everything is additive. Reversing the intuitive use of the Q's is where the answer is most likely to be. Very elusive so far. Olie,lack of variety in spouses as being a good thing to me means your happily married and/or she bought your last Alembic!!! LOL
bsee
Senior Member
Username: bsee

Post Number: 1292
Registered: 3-2004
Posted on Monday, August 21, 2006 - 8:22 am:   Edit Post

bk, if you can get a JB tone out of Signature electronics, the settings should be pretty similar for Series, no? What settings do you use on the Signature setup?

Wood recipe could be getting in your way as well. It seems harder to get the JB tone out of an Alembic with really dense neck woods. My new Alembic with an ebony neck stringer is just too clean and tight to sound vintage Jazz, but I can get it out of the others. I can get close enough with the new bass after it goes through the tube pre, but that wouldn't pacify your engineer.
olieoliver
Senior Member
Username: olieoliver

Post Number: 627
Registered: 2-2006
Posted on Monday, August 21, 2006 - 8:28 am:   Edit Post

Very happily married Barry, but even if I weren't, who could afford more than one wife. :-)
alembic76407
Senior Member
Username: alembic76407

Post Number: 469
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Monday, August 21, 2006 - 9:57 am:   Edit Post

bkbass, I was trying to be funny, I.ve had the same problem in the studio, I had an old Fender bass I had installed a knob (not wired up to anything)so when the engineer said my bass was muddy, I would turn the knob till he said stop, that sounds better.

moral to the story;
I play my Alembic in the studio.
soundmen and engineers don't like bass player anyway LOL

David T (TLO and full of __it!!!!!!!!)
just having fun
bkbass
Intermediate Member
Username: bkbass

Post Number: 102
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Monday, August 21, 2006 - 12:17 pm:   Edit Post

Olie,I'm just finishing up the big "D" (got to keep the basses!) so if #2 comes along I'll reserve comment till then.LOL! 76407,been there but my dummy knob only fooled managers and club owners. The signature packages (2 basses)where custom wired by Ron since I wanted a stereo/mono operation he had to custom order stereo balance controls to his specific taper. Working with 2 volumes,2 Q's and 2 CVQ's is quite daunting.
keavin
Senior Member
Username: keavin

Post Number: 906
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 - 5:06 am:   Edit Post

pick-up positioning also determines what type of tone your Bass will offer too.....i knoticed on signature Basses the pups are farther from the neck than on series basses which would offer more of a mid-range (fenderish) tone.
bkbass
Intermediate Member
Username: bkbass

Post Number: 103
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 - 12:46 pm:   Edit Post

Your right there is a difference in the spacing,good point. But again this is for series 2 doodling/hacking/messin around so in essence(no pun)we are starting with a clean slate of the series 2 platform and talking pure tone/volume settings regardless of wood,PU,etc. I still welcome all comments.
mica
Moderator
Username: mica

Post Number: 3494
Registered: 6-2000
Posted on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 - 4:57 pm:   Edit Post

Yo Barry!

I'd probably keep your CVQs turned low, almost to nill. This will reduce some the attack, and get your sound more JB.

On thing on your bass that you will be fighting against is the Walnut/Purpleheart neck. The Purpleheart has a good bright sound and the Walnut makes the attack pretty sharp naturally.

Try keep your plucking fingers away from the bridge too. Listen to the difference in sound if you pluck above the bridge pickup, the neck pickup and at the 12th fret. You will hear it.

You might also want to consider experimenting with flat/ground/halfwound strings, or coated strings. At least keep the steels off it.
mdrdvp
Intermediate Member
Username: mdrdvp

Post Number: 192
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 4:37 am:   Edit Post

I wanted the same thing as Barry. I was thinking about a small body bass with jazz bass pickups but I'm not sure if it will sound the way I want it. I love the sound of my Sadowsky but I prefer the small bodies.
So, just for trial I added a double channel strip between my power supply and my amp. Two channels, Bass, Mid, Treble and compression. Very simple. Bass to power supply, p.s. stereo to pre-amps. Neck to channel A, bridge to B, outputs A+B (combined) mono to glockenklang amp with the SF-2 in the effectloop. Works great. It gives me all the sounds I need, including jazz bass type of sounds. To go back to the original alembic sound, simply bypass the eq on the pre-amps. On my series I, both switches up. And it all fits in the trunk of my car and I'm not driving a truck.
But be careful, the wrong amp can also create a lot of noise.

Manfred
kmh364
Senior Member
Username: kmh364

Post Number: 1990
Registered: 9-2003
Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 7:47 am:   Edit Post

Manfred:

A small ash-bodied set-maple neck w/ Alembic J activators will sound like a J-bass and a whole lot more. The original EMW COTM was created with that in mind, and as an owner of one, I can tell you mission accomplished.

Cheers,

Kevin

Barry: How's it goin', bro?
bkbass
Intermediate Member
Username: bkbass

Post Number: 104
Registered: 11-2003
Posted on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 - 8:23 am:   Edit Post

Thanks Mica, I'm actually looking for the JB sound out of my fretted Series 2 Rogue w/maple/PH neck lams. Remember that one? Everybody has Jelly on the brain!LOL Also,thank Mary for sending out the 7 string blueprints. Hey kmh! I can be reached in NYMT-BP for now. Go on the e-net for the number.Much to speak on dude.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration