Tube market in danger? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Alembic Club » Miscellaneous » Archive: 2006 » Archive through June 16, 2006 » Tube market in danger? « Previous Next »

Author Message
valvil
Moderator
Username: valvil

Post Number: 894
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 5:11 pm:   Edit Post

Interesting article I read in the NY times a few days ago regarding the vacuum tube biz.

Here's a link to the International Herald Tribune site, which also carried it.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/08/business/cheat.php

Valentino
bigredbass
Senior Member
Username: bigredbass

Post Number: 801
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 7:10 pm:   Edit Post

OK, so they say that Russia is one of three countries with tube production: Who are the other two?

Is tube production now such an ancient and arcane technology that one could NOT go into business now without fabricating the production machinery from old blueprints? Is it comparable to going back into production of steam locomotives or radial aircraft engines?

My understanding is that the former Soviet Union stayed with tube production as supposedly tube circuits were impervious to electromagnetic pulse following a nuclear detonation. Hard to imagine MiG29's flying around with tubes behind the control panel, but true.

I've always worried about the scenario of running out of tubes one day from purely economic reasons as demand slowly decreased as overhead slowly rose for the businesses involved.
But of course, in most of this world, payoffs are a cost of doing business, but the problem is that it always goes up and up. It's alarming from the standpoint that we may be headed to a time where any and all tubes, no matter how pedestrian, go for the rates of 'vintage' tubes that are for sale now.

J o e y
valvil
Moderator
Username: valvil

Post Number: 895
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 7:37 pm:   Edit Post

The other 2 are China and the Czech Republic.

Valentino
bigredbass
Senior Member
Username: bigredbass

Post Number: 804
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 7:43 pm:   Edit Post

Well, China could be the same song, second verse.

On the other hand, the Czechs hit the ground running the minute the Warsaw Pact went the way of the dodo. The Czech-sourced instruments I've seen (the Spectors and NS bowed instruments) are first rate, and hopefully so are their tubes.

J o e y
valvil
Moderator
Username: valvil

Post Number: 896
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 7:57 pm:   Edit Post

I agree about Czech craftsmanship, Joey; those guys have a serious tradition over there. They also make incredible beer.

I always thought that the Czech-made Spectors were a great value buy compared with the American made ones. Both really nice and well made, but one about half the price of the other.

Valentino
jalevinemd
Senior Member
Username: jalevinemd

Post Number: 445
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Friday, June 02, 2006 - 9:25 pm:   Edit Post

The Czech-made Dean guitars are supposed to be excellent as well.
bigredbass
Senior Member
Username: bigredbass

Post Number: 809
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Saturday, June 03, 2006 - 10:12 am:   Edit Post

The Czechs have a long history of fabulous bowed instrument craftsmanship.

I saw a NY-state Spector at a dealer ($5K) sitting next to an identically built Czech NS2 ($2K), and aside from not a lot of difference in the quilt maple figure and abalone markers, there CERTAINLY wasn't three grand difference in the build quality. I applaud Spector for maintaining a US production base, but however he and Ned S came up with outsourcing to the Czech Republic, it was a SMART move.

So is it just financial suicide to BUILD a new tube production facility? OR, sell the property to this Russian Mafia and MOVE the equipment to a suitably benign business location?

J o e y
keith_h
Senior Member
Username: keith_h

Post Number: 456
Registered: 2-2005
Posted on Saturday, June 03, 2006 - 11:31 am:   Edit Post

"So is it just financial suicide to BUILD a new tube production facility?"

One of the issues with vacuum tubes was their manfacturing is highly polluting (at one at least). This was one of the things that hastened the end of tube manufacuring in the US. Countries such as Russia and China are much looser on their environmental laws which helped keep manufacturing costs down. I expect that the cost of moving and meeting a stable countries environmental laws to be more than you could make back in a reasonable time.
jalevinemd
Senior Member
Username: jalevinemd

Post Number: 446
Registered: 12-2003
Posted on Saturday, June 03, 2006 - 11:47 am:   Edit Post

All I know is that a set of four new old stock EL34 Mullard tubes will cost me about $500 for my Hiwatt, should I need to replace them.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration