| Author | Message | ||
| pts
Junior Username: pts Post Number: 19 Registered: 12-2005 |
From what I can see here, most folks seem to go for the PLX (the older ones with a bridged output feature). Does anyone have any thoughts on the RMX line? Is the relative lightness the main thing for luring bassists toward the PLX line rather than the RMX? | ||
| glocke
Advanced Member Username: glocke Post Number: 353 Registered: 9-2002 |
If you want light, check out stewart power amps. I have an RMX/demeter setup that stays home because of the weight. | ||
| bassman10096
Senior Member Username: bassman10096 Post Number: 1106 Registered: 7-2003 |
Agree on the Stewarts. The reason I went with PLX (2402) was weight. No knock on the RMX series. I've never seen anybody who didn't like theirs. | ||
| keith_h
Senior Member Username: keith_h Post Number: 991 Registered: 2-2005 |
I actually use both the older PLX and the newer PLX2 series amps. They are both much lighter than the RMX line. The newer PLX2 also have a built in crossover that the RMX line doesn't have. Both lines are very reliable and as a matter of fact many sound companies use the RMX line to drive the subs on their PA's. If the RMX line is in your price range and weight isn't an issue you will be well served. Keith | ||
| glocke
Advanced Member Username: glocke Post Number: 354 Registered: 9-2002 |
Peter, If the weight isnt an issue for you, I have an RMX 850 I might interested in letting go. | ||
| dadabass2001
Senior Member Username: dadabass2001 Post Number: 876 Registered: 6-2002 |
I had an RMX 1450 that i just sold. It was sitting in my garage for two years (weight) because I bought a PLX 1602. Both amps sounded fine but the PLX makes my life MUCH easier. Mike |
