Thinking out loud - question about co... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Alembic Club » Miscellaneous » Archive through November 11, 2010 » Archive: 2008 » Archive through October 25, 2008 » Thinking out loud - question about compressors « Previous Next »

Author Message
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7048
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 4:58 pm:   Edit Post

I have an Alesis 3630 dual channel compressor limiter. I haven't looked at the manual to see if it addresses this question; I was just thinking of an idea about how to address a problem in my signal chain, and thought I would run it by you guys, in case you may already know the answer.

Can I put the two channels in different places in the signal chain? For instance, can I put one channel in the path between the preamp and the effects unit, and the other channel somewhere after the effects unit and before the power amp? In other words, are the two channels two completely independent pieces of gear?
lidon2001
Advanced Member
Username: lidon2001

Post Number: 393
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 6:43 pm:   Edit Post

Hi Dave,

On the Alesis website it says the unit has a "Stereo/Link" button, so in stereo mode it should act as two independent units.
lidon2001
Advanced Member
Username: lidon2001

Post Number: 394
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 6:43 pm:   Edit Post

Hi Dave,

On the Alesis website it says the unit has a "Stereo/Link" button, so in stereo mode it should act as two independent units.

T
lidon2001
Advanced Member
Username: lidon2001

Post Number: 395
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 6:45 pm:   Edit Post

Answered in stereo no less...

T
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7055
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 7:11 pm:   Edit Post

Stereo! Hee hee!

Thanks; I may give it a try. It will be a little while before I do, as I have a little preamp issue I need to take care of first. And I may even be rethinking my whole approach to effects. I'm having some technical difficulties that seem beyond my limited abilities to solve. But using the two channels in two different places could be very useful depending on how things shake out.
jbybj
Intermediate Member
Username: jbybj

Post Number: 182
Registered: 6-2006
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 7:35 pm:   Edit Post

Typically, two channels of compression, in stereo mode, will make both channels respond identically to either channel's threshold being crossed. In other words, it will maintain the stereo image by riding the gain on both channels simultaneously. With the stereo/link mode off, they should act as independent channels, just the opposite of what lidon2001 has posted.
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7056
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 7:43 pm:   Edit Post

Thanks James! That's what I figured he meant, that the link button meant there was a choice to have them unlinked.
lidon2001
Advanced Member
Username: lidon2001

Post Number: 396
Registered: 4-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 10:12 pm:   Edit Post

I stand, actually sitting, corrected. In the owners manual they say Stereo and Dual Mono modes.

T
mike1762
Intermediate Member
Username: mike1762

Post Number: 112
Registered: 1-2008
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 5:13 pm:   Edit Post

I'm not sure why you would want/need compression at 2 points of a signal chain. Once the signal is "squashed" at the first point, I'm not sure what would then "expand" it so that another point of compression would be required. You would be compressing an already compressed signal; therefore, you might have "pumping" problems and/or totally lose your dynamics.
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7060
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 6:11 pm:   Edit Post

I'm using the Ashly that I use now, and I would be using the channels of the Alesis if I went with it, as a limiter rather than a compressor. I like a wide uncompressed dynamic range. The Ashly is just there to protect the speakers from a spike. Past experience has shown this to be a good idea as I have a rather wide dynamic range of techniques, and in the past there have been times I've heard the speakers pop when I've been playing aggressively. The Ashly also serves as the last gain control before the Elf to get the level of signal going to the power amp where I want it to be to drive the speakers safely and efficiently. The idea of a second limiter in the chain has come up recently as every once in a while I'm getting a high frequency pop in my signal when I've been playing rather aggressively. It appears that I may be overdriving my rather sensitive effects unit. I have reduced the trim pots on my bass, and that seems to be helping. However, I'm going to be having my preamp looked at for a problem that may or may not be related, so I probably won't do anything else until I get the preamp back. If I decide that reducing the trim pots on the bass solves the problem, then I might just go with that. However, as I write this and think through it, I'm now wondering if reducing the output of the bass reduces the degree to which I'm driving the preamp tubes. Might have to think about that for a while.
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7063
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 7:29 pm:   Edit Post

I seem to recall that sometime ago there was a thread within which was a discussion about the effect the volume control has on the second tube stage of an F-2B, but I've been looking for the last hour and I can't find it.

I think some memory cells are not functioning properly, so please correct me if this isn't correct. But I seem to recall that if you turn the volume control on the F-2B from 5 to 8, and then reduce the gain control on the power amp so that the overall loudness is the same, the result should be a warmer, less clean, tone. I even seem to recall having tried this experiment.

I think I need an infusion of antioxidants.
elwoodblue
Senior Member
Username: elwoodblue

Post Number: 556
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 7:44 pm:   Edit Post

Dave is this what you were looking for?
(taken from the alembic store description)
"The mono output on the rear of the F-2B provides a facility to use a stereo instrument with a mono power amplifier. The mixing resistors associated with the mono jack are only connected together when a plug is inserted, thus preserving maximum stereo isolation when using the separate Channel A and Channel B outputs. Another application is to connect the two channels in cascade, by a cable from the Channel A output jack on the rear to the Channel B input jack on the front. The power amplifier is connected to Channel B's output. The signal from Channel A is high enough to drive the first stage of Channel B into distortion. The tone controls of Channel A are used to emphasize those frequencies which will be most distorted, while the controls of Channel B shape the color of the resulting distortion. Channel A's volume control sets the amount of distortion, while the Volume Control of Channel B sets the output level (Master Volume)"


on a side note, I occasionally use a compressor before my rack gear to tame the signal a slight amount, sort of as a limiter, then one at the end to frame the signal for my recording gear...sometimes before the reverb units so any noise is gated but the reverb sings on.

I'm not sure how the pro's do it but I've had success this way without to much pumping or squashing.
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7066
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 7:48 pm:   Edit Post

Thanks Elwood, but that wasn't it; in fact, I just read that whole page you quoted just a little while ago.
elwoodblue
Senior Member
Username: elwoodblue

Post Number: 557
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 8:29 pm:   Edit Post

ah well...thought I'd give luck a try

keep up the tone quest :-)...it's got to be one of the more interesting sitcheations we put ourselves into.

cheers
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7068
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 17, 2008 - 9:13 pm:   Edit Post

The ever evolving quest for tone.
jas
Junior
Username: jas

Post Number: 15
Registered: 4-2008
Posted on Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 3:34 am:   Edit Post

If you want to experiment you can play with using compressors in a series/parallel mix. You can send your signal to the input of two devices, say an amp and a low pass filter. The output from the filter can go through a compressor and be added to the amp input. This is a simple example, you can make it as complex as you want. Basically, you will be compressing low frequency components of your signal as well as having a straight signal. If you send your bass to the inputs of a low pass AND a high pass filter and you use a compressor after the LPF, this is a more accurate method.
Here, you'd be compressing in the frequency domain. You can even compress in the time domain but that means compressing after the "wet" output of a delay.
In a straight set up (serial, one after another) you're compressing in the amplitude domain. Use filters in parallel and you're using the frequency domain. There are endless possibilities!
Is this clear? I really need to draw diagrams ... but remember to mix it up and have fun! You may find some crazy set up that you like.

Cheers,
Jas :-)
davehouck
Moderator
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 7082
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 10:52 am:   Edit Post

Interesting ideas; I'll give that some thought when I start in on reviewing my setup. Thanks!

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration