37" B String - NonAlembic, But Intere... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

Alembic Club » Miscellaneous » Archive: 2005 » Archive through October 17, 2005 » Archive - 2004 » Archive through March 10, 2004 » 37" B String - NonAlembic, But Interesting « Previous Next »

Author Message
poor_nigel
Junior
Username: poor_nigel

Post Number: 32
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Sunday, February 15, 2004 - 5:03 am:   Edit Post

Bass Northwest has a very interesting Dingwall bass with a 37" B String tapering down to a 34" G String. This is very innovative in my book. If I win the lottery and order a custom Alembic, it will have these. Definitely something to consider when ordering a bass they will make any way you want one. Imagine this bass made by Alembic . . . .
URL provided for those who want to check out the pdf file on this bass.
http://www.bassnw.com/New%20Exotic%20%20Basses/dingwall_prima_artist_5_st.htm
rami
Advanced Member
Username: rami

Post Number: 293
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Sunday, February 15, 2004 - 6:36 am:   Edit Post

Cool Bass! What a great exercise in design. Too bad about the bolt on neck though - for that price, I feel a neck through is more appropriate.
Great design though - very innovative.

Rami
davehouck
Advanced Member
Username: davehouck

Post Number: 376
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Sunday, February 15, 2004 - 10:05 am:   Edit Post

The idea of an "Alder treble core" and a "Walnut bass core" is interesting, and probably more relevant on a bolt-on (or set-neck) than on a neck-through. The Redwood top and back are nice. The Neutrik locking jack is also a nice touch.

Mica has been asked about this before and mentioned that in addition to all the one-time engineering costs there is also the matter of the license fee that has to be paid to Novax. When you think about it, just about everything on such a bass would be a one-time custom build; headstock, nut, neck, body wings, pickup positioning, maybe even the pickups themselves to get them wide enough for the proper angle across the strings, and of course individual bridge and tail pieces. It would make for an interesting project.
bassman10096
Intermediate Member
Username: bassman10096

Post Number: 112
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, February 16, 2004 - 8:16 am:   Edit Post

Wow. This bass is engineered!! Nice looking woods and woodwork, too. The non-parallel frets are visually amazing, but look like they'd be a serious project to get used to. I agree with Dave. Virtually all would be a first time custom for Alembic (as I'm sure it was for Dingwall!). Interesting design, though. The kind people usually just talk about, but no one does.

Bill
adriaan
Intermediate Member
Username: adriaan

Post Number: 127
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Monday, February 16, 2004 - 8:39 am:   Edit Post

As far as I know Dingwall has been building basses with fanned frets for years now - don't know if they ever build without them. There are lots of posts on http://www.talkbass.com about Dingwall. Apparently you get used to the fanned frets a lot quicker than you might think.
palembic
Senior Member
Username: palembic

Post Number: 1048
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Monday, February 16, 2004 - 8:58 am:   Edit Post

Yep ...there was an A/B thing going on in one of the last years Bass-player of the passed century (sounds amazing no???) and the test-persons all gave the same comment. It's a LOT easier to play if YOU DON'T LOOK AT THE NECK.
Weird huh??
But it was chosen as one of the best sounding 5 strings (surely the best B-string)

Paul the bad one
bassman10096
Intermediate Member
Username: bassman10096

Post Number: 115
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, February 16, 2004 - 3:04 pm:   Edit Post

Shows how little I knew!

Bill

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration